From the Department Bylaws:
(A) The Annual Evaluation Advisory Committee shall conduct the peer reviews and the post-tenure peer reviews for the Department.
(B) The Committee shall receive from the Department Head a draft annual evaluation of each faculty member and copies of the relevant materials upon which the evaluation was based.
(C) The Committee shall review each annual evaluation in a timely manner and prepare a responsive report to each evaluation. Minority reports from the Committee are permitted.
(D) Reports from the Committee may
(E) The Department Head shall consider the Committee's report(s) as advisory in determining the final evaluation report of each faculty member with one exception. If the draft evaluation if a faculty member presented by the head to the Committee is "unsatisfactory," and the Committee, by majority vote, does not concur, the Department Head may not award an unsatisfactory to that faculty member.
If both the Head of the Department and the Faculty Annual Evaluation Advisory Committee award a faculty member a rating of "unsatisfactory" that faculty member may appeal the evaluation to the tenured faculty of the department, which after considering the basis of the evaluation may either uphold or reject the evaluation.
(F) Members of the Committee will recuse themselves when their own evaluation is being considered by the Committee. At that time the alternate will be seated as a full member of the Committee.